John, thanks for this post. It clarifies your Patom theory and Role & Reference Grammar, not to mention our own cognitive software architecture rationale. I know that neuroscientist’s will resonate with your explanations, but I suspect that data scientist’s will find the leap from neurons, to concepts, to meaning/language to be troubling.
I look forward to your next article. Dennis L Thomas
The goal is to outline the theory. I'm glad you got something out of it. Troubling for some or not, as it was to me as the theory came together, it seems to explain a lot consistently with observtion. It was surprising that much of what I was taught didn't work!
John, thanks for this post. It clarifies your Patom theory and Role & Reference Grammar, not to mention our own cognitive software architecture rationale. I know that neuroscientist’s will resonate with your explanations, but I suspect that data scientist’s will find the leap from neurons, to concepts, to meaning/language to be troubling.
I look forward to your next article. Dennis L Thomas
The goal is to outline the theory. I'm glad you got something out of it. Troubling for some or not, as it was to me as the theory came together, it seems to explain a lot consistently with observtion. It was surprising that much of what I was taught didn't work!